photo by Heather Renee_____ 


 

This is the backup data for the column in News@Norman Apr 9, 2008.  The column is repeated below..

 

Power Point Presentation to Commissioners, Apr 7, 2008 (click to download)

 

Spreadsheet analysis of all 2000 waterfront properties, sorted by neighborhood, and showing those that sold in 2006 and 2007 (click to download)

And a comparison of 2007 waterfront land values and 2008 waterfront land values.
(click to download)

Links to the portions of the General Statutes referenced in the story. (click to download)

 

Summary of recent tax changes for senior citizens
(click to download)

 

News@Norman article Apr 9, 2008


The recent ‘drive-by’ revaluation has some people up in arms.

That’s ‘drive-by’, as in random, and ‘drive-by’ as in done from a moving automobile.

The statute says ‘market value’ as of Jan 1, 2008*.

In neighborhood 514A property that sold in 2006 and 2007 was valued at between 92% and 128% of what it sold for.  The most egregious case was a sale on Nov 30, 2007 and then valued at 121% of what it sold for.*

This property increased in value 21% in 30 days?  Sure, and I also believe in the tooth fairy!  The 128% property was given a building value of $ 60 per sq ft, while its immediate neighbor (same condition C+10) was assigned $120.  This artificially inflated the land value for the house that sold.

The real problem is that the land value from each  sale was copied into the land values for the entire neighborhood, so 195 homes have unwarranted land values.  Some other neighborhoods have similar issues.

Flashback to Dec, 2006:  The tax department presented a revised county line which would have moved about 30 residents into Gaston County.  The tax folks wanted this to be effective within 24 days, after the required ‘public hearing’.

County Commissioners were told that the law required them to sign off, but they refused, dug in their heels, and eventually had the county line reset by the state. 

They ‘Did the Right Thing!’

And now, in the face of unrest (from many hundred residents) about the recent revaluation, Commissioners claim they lack authority to make changes.

Commissioners have absolute authority to organize the county government.  (GS153A-76)* Commissioners ARE ‘local tax officials’ (GS105.273(10a))* -- they waive taxes at every meeting.  Commissioners ARE the members of the Board of Equalization and Review (to which you submit your formal requests for review prior to Apr 29)*, unless they appoint others (they did).  (GS105-322(a))* If the Board of E&R is NOT in session (they aren’t until Apr 29), then the Commissioners ARE the Board of E&R!  (GS105-317.1)* They have all the statutory authority they need to ‘Do the Right Thing’

County Commissioners did agree to move up the next revaluation by one year (its now underway).  The Tax Department claimed lack of manpower to do it faster -- meanwhile we've laid off 4-6 building inspectors, who have just the background to help an assessor!

Elect someone to ‘Do the Right Thing!


For More Information Contact:

Elect Martin Oakes
Tel: (704) 483-0419
Internet: martinoakes@charter.net

 

Send mail to martinoakes@charter.net with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2012 Elect Martin Oakes
Last modified: 01/23/12